Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Isabella Shinikova vs Tena Lukas Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Shinikova vs Lukas analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Isabella Shinikova vs Tena Lukas Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Shinikova 2 - 0 Lukas
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Shinikova has won 43.66% of points on their second serve, while Lukas has won 41.12%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Shinikova, in recent form, has won 56.64% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lukas has won 57.18%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.33% and 43.53% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Shinikova has saved 48.96% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lukas has saved 50.3% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Shinikova has won 59.49% of matches played (W/L 47/ 32), with Lukas winning 58.67% (W/L 44/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Shinikova has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 157/ 86), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 4/ 12). Lukas has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 387/ 242), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 32% (W/L 21/ 44).
- Player level: In the last year, Shinikova has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.11% of matches (W/L 44/ 28), where as Lukas has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.56% of matches (W/L 43/ 28). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Shinikova winning 2 times and Lukas being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Shinikova winning 4 and Lukas winning 1. The last match between Shinikova and Lukas was at the Glasgow, 30-01-2018, Q3, I.hard with Isabella Shinikova getting the victory 2-6 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:41:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Shinikova and Lukas have played a deciding set 1 times, with Shinikova winning 1 times and Lukas 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Shinikova winning 0, and Lukas 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Shinikova has played against opponents with an average rank of 306.54 while Lukas has played against players with an average rank of 254.17.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Shinikova has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lukas has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Shinikova has converted 46.06% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lukas has converted 50.14% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
251
Rank
133
High
32
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
2
Indoor0
0
Grass0
224
Rank
200
High
29
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
60% (578-391)
Career Total W/L
58% (426-313)
50% (19-19)
YTD W/L
56% (19-15)
$232,173
Career Prize Money
$31,490
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Isabella Shinikova vs Tena Lukas For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Shinikova VS Lukas
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| stats | Isabella Shinikova | Tena Lukas |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 26 | 22 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 4 |
| DFs Total | 16 | 11 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:30 | 1:41:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (96/171) | 55% (82/150) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (65/96) | 74% (61/82) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 49% (37/75) | 43% (29/68) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (7/16) | 29% (5/17) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (60/150) | 40% (69/171) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Isabella Shinikova
Player
Tena Lukas
56%
(
54 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
90)
4
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
10
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
41 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
90)
93
Total Points Won
94
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Isabella Shinikova
Player
Tena Lukas
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Isabella Shinikova | Tena Lukas |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (19/19) | 56% (19/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (43/42) | 54% (45/38) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (406/390) | 51% (379/371) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 57% (13/10) | 58% (18/13) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.22 |
| Aces Total | 76 | 82 |
| DFs per game | 0.41 | 0.62 |
| DFs Total | 157 | 227 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:32:30 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 282.16 | 247.35 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1492/2454) | 59% (1483/2502) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (898/1492) | 59% (874/1483) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (420/962) | 41% (419/1019) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (158/343) | 50% (175/349) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (1210/2590) | 48% (1206/2504) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (16/16) | 60% (18/12) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (19/38) | 56% (19/34) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 11% (1/9) | 57% (4/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 44% (4/9) | 53% (8/15) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (19/17) | 78% (18/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (19/2) | 22% (18/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 11% (19/2) | 31% (16/5) |
Isabella Shinikova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Aneta Kladivova
Player
Isabella Shinikova
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
42 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
60
|
2-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Isabella Shinikova
Player
Daniela Vismane
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Taylah Preston
Player
Isabella Shinikova
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Isabella Shinikova
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martina Colmegna
Player
Isabella Shinikova
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lan Mi
Player
Isabella Shinikova
85%
(
76 of
89)
1st Serve %
67%
(
47 of
70)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
43%
(
38 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Isabella Shinikova
Player
Anastasiya Poplavska
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
42%
(
22 of
52)
7
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
7
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Isabella Shinikova
80%
(
60 of
75)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Isabella Shinikova
Player
Sandra Samir
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
54%
(
50 of
93)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
50%
(
23 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
47%
(
39 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
90
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Tena Lukas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Panna Udvardy
Player
Tena Lukas
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Katy Dunne
63%
(
80 of
126)
1st Serve %
54%
(
82 of
152)
7
Aces
6
12
Double Faults
8
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
52 of
82)
54%
(
25 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
46 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
61 of
152)
141
Total Points Won
137
|
6-7(6) 6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leolia Jeanjean
Player
Tena Lukas
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
74
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lia Karatancheva
Player
Tena Lukas
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Tena Lukas
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
9
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lola Radivojevic
Player
Tena Lukas
53%
(
38 of
72)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Alexandra Eala
58%
(
80 of
139)
1st Serve %
68%
(
68 of
100)
8
Aces
1
21
Double Faults
4
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
29%
(
17 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
69 of
139)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
51 of
100)
121
Total Points Won
118
|
7-5 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anastasiya Soboleva
Player
Tena Lukas
76%
(
70 of
92)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
7
50%
(
35 of
70)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
53%
(
49 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
50 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Kaylah Mcphee
66%
(
82 of
125)
1st Serve %
80%
(
79 of
99)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
44%
(
55 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
116
Total Points Won
108
|
5-7 6-0 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jana Fett
Player
Tena Lukas
75%
(
51 of
68)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
50%
(
34 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Shinikova Vs Lukas Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Shinikova are available here and Lukas photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
